December 1988

MCRS Chairman Jack Boone reports:

On September 24th the MCRS hosted a meeting at Northspur to formulate a strategy for increasing the awareness and utilization of rail in Northern California. The meeting was well attended and extremely productive. As a follow-up we have contacted ten RR role-model states and asked for their assistance. To this date the states of Iowa, New York, South Dakota, Michigan, and Tennessee have responded. Their input has been valuable and we now have a model framework to offer for consideration.

A December 15th meeting (too late to report on in this issue) in Willits provided a quarterly progress report to our constituency and planned Phase Two of our strategy for Railway Regeneration.

 

 January/February 1989

MCRS-Sponsored Symposium Explores Regeneration of County Rail

 

ON DECEMBER 15, 1988 the   Mendocino County Railway Society sponsored a symposium with the theme "New Life for Redwood Empire Railroads." The meeting brought together representatives of regulatory agencies, railroads, the lumber industry, and tourism groups, with officials from city,  county, and  state' governments. The focus of the day was on

the ways and means of making rail service once again a vital force in the region's economy. What follows are highlights of that meeting:

 

Art Lloyd of Amtrak: "In fact, some statistics are quite amazing. The Los Angeles/San Diego (Amtrak) trains returned 133% of their costs in September, and the San Joaquin trains returned 99% of their costs. So we're well on the way to not being a burden on the taxpayer, and that's our eventual aim.

 

   "Amtrak's problem today, that I might as well discuss right now, is that we're suffering from a lack of equipment. We have more demand than there is supply.

 

   "You (NWPRR) can tie in with the proposed Marin/Sonoma commuter operation, if that ever gets off the ground, and run down into Larkspur and connect with ferries or buses into San Francisco."

 

Larry D. Ruple, Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad:

 

"We hope to pledge to you the support of the Rio Grande as a small company, which is now a larger company, for working with the NWP and the other groups up here in putting this together as a coalition, or a team effort, and finding out what shippers have needed and what they didn't receive-and doing it as a team!"

 Gerald Allen, California Western Railroad:

"We're optimistic for '89. We're moving now towards getting a schedule. We're going to be running some additional tourists/

recreational trips from the Fort Bragg area. We got engine 45 back."

 

From county government: Jim Eddie, Supervisor, Mendocino County:

"My board is trying to support railroads in every way possible. We know they're important to the North Coast. One thing that bothers me, as well as the other board members, is that it is so difficult to improve the roads going north. We've used up the existing corridors, and expanding those roads becomes extremely difficult. It looks like railroad is the best alternative we've got going to Eureka and now to the coast. We need to all work together in some type of a coalition to strengthen railroads."

 

 From city government: Ed Scott, Mayor, Willits:

"If you're in the railroad business, want you in this area; if you're a shipper, those railroads need your business; and if you're part of the PUC-part of the government, or regulatory agencies-we're going to need your cooperation."

 

From consumer groups: Joanna Avilla, Standard Structures, Santa Rosa: 

 "I should say that the existence of Standard Structures is dependent upon the railroad."

 

Rod Woolley, Pacific Lumber Co., Scotia:

"Pacific Lumber used to ship-when I used to work for them in '77-over 90% of our lumber by rail. Up until this year it was down to about 10%. The last couple of months it's been getting better."

 

From railroad advocates: 

Jack Boone, Chairman, MCRS:

"The three railroads, the California Western, the Eureka Southern, and the Denver & Rio Grande Western (which now owns the NWP line), affect locally six counties and directly affect the entire state. Our goal, our reason for being here, is to develop a viable methodology that can allow and assist railroads to become totally regenerated to service today and tomorrow."

 

Tony Leibert, North Bay Transit Committee:

"We've been able to convince all eleven incorporated Marin County cities that rail is the way to go for the Highway 101 commuter crunch between Healdsburg and San Francisco. Two weeks ago all eleven endorsed rail over a busway to use the NWP right-of-way."

 

Ruth Rockefeller, MCRS: 

"I'd like to give an overview of the data we've received from other states concerning their rail transportation. The common thread is that most of them began to act when they were faced with terrible losses of rail trackage. In Iowa, they were going to lose 50% of their track in 1980. South Dakota, I think, was losing 9,000 miles of track. Much of this was because of the business failures of the Rock Island, the Great Northern, and other big railroads.

So, other states have acted where perhaps we've been a little smug. We haven't been faced with the devastating loss that others have. We of the Society believe that we need to act regionally and also reach out to the other areas in the state where there are short lines that need help."

 

August – September 1989

 News Briefs from MCRS

The two meetings in September and December of 1988 were followed by a conference in January of 1989 in Senator Keene’s office in Sacramento. Several MCRS directors, CPUC representatives and a railroad expert met with Senator Keene's and Assemblyman Hauser's legislative transportation analysts.

 

The following bills were the direct results of this meeting. Legislative Update

 

AB 1374 (Railroad Rehabilitation Bill by Assemblyman Dan Hauser) passed the Senate Transportation  Committee on August 22. The next step is the Appropriations Committee. Your support is still needed. Write to:

Assemblyman Dan Hauser's Office, State Capitol, Sacramento CA 95814. AB 1374 will provide funds for the California short lines in need whose survival is shown to be essential to the economic well-being of the areas they serve.

Senator Barry Keene's Railroad Authority Bill (SB  1663) was placed on the Consent Calendar of the Assembly Ways and Means Committee on August 23 and approved. The next step is the Assembly floor. Send your  support to Senator Keene's office, State Capitol, Sacramento", CA 95814.

SB 1663 will create a railroad authority for Mendocino and Humboldt counties. 

December 1989

 

Railroads Fared Better In San Francisco Earthquake Than Highways

THE SAN FRANCISCO EARTHQUAKE, at 5:07 PM on October 17th, caused the collapse of the Bay Bridge, part of the Nimitz freeway and closing of Highway 17 to Santa Cruz, and many other sections of the road system in the Bay Area.

BART and Caltrain crews immediately went to work to check out  the tracks, tunnels and bridges, but no damage was reported on the Caltrain tracks and only minor damage on BART. Caltrain started operations again at 10:00 PM and BART’s regular weekday morning commute service began rolling right on schedule early on Wednesday, October 18th.

Naturally, both BART and Caltrain had increased riderships after the earthquake: BART has carried about 50% more passengers above  its pre-quake normal, and Caltrain 30% more, which has gone down now to 20%.

Caltrain had also run an additional train all the way from Salinas to San Jose, coming north in  the morning, going south in the evening. At first only 160 passengers were patronizing the train, but the ridership climbed to 450 before the train was discontinued after Highway 17 opened again.

  

 Lesson: Would it not be much wiser to invest our transportation funds in railroads instead of highways?

Rail Legislation Moves Through Sacramento

By Ruth Rockefeller

 

 FOUR PIECES OF CALIFORNIA LEGISLATION may affect North Coast railroading. One is specific to the North Coast; the others have statewide implications.

             At this writing, three have been signed into law by Governor George Deukmejian. The fourth is an initiative, which will appear on the June 1990 ballot. Funding for one of the three already enacted will depend on the passage of two June 1990 ballot measures.

    The four pieces of legislation are: SB 1663, which establishes a North Coast Railroad Authority; AB 1374, which provides for short-line rehabilitation projects throughout the state; the Intercity Rail and the Commuter and Urban Rail Programs, which are a part of the major transportation package passed by the legislature and signed by the governor; and, finally, the Clean Air and Rail Transportation Bond Act.

    They will be described briefly in the order in which they appear above and then in greater detail.

                 SB 1663, establishing the North Coast Rail Authority, was authored by Senator Barry Keene and coauthored by Assemblyman Dan Hauser. It is intended to provide an alternative for ensuring railroad service if the Interstate Commerce Commission authorizes the abandonment or discontinuance of service on the Eureka Southern, the California Western, or the Northwestern Pacific Railroad. The authority would have the power to issue bonds, payable from revenues of any facility or enterprise to be acquired or constructed by that body.

                 AB 1374, which was authored by Assemblyman Hauser and coauthored by Senator Keene, provides for funding of short-line rehabilitation projects through the Transportation Planning and Development (TP&D) Account of the State Transportation Fund. AB 1374 was passed as an urgency statute and the deadline for application to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) was December 1, 1989.

    The Intercity Rail and the Commuter and Urban Rail Transit Programs will not be funded unless two measures are passed by the voters next June. One of these is State Constitution Amendment 1 (SCA 1), which would raise the Gann spending limit and increase the gasoline tax. In relation to this amendment, but specific to rail funding, is a separate $1 billion bond issue.

     Even though the funding is not yet in place, Caltrans set a deadline of December 1 of this year for application, with the goal of including projects in a Proposed State Improvement Program (PSTIP) to be submitted for approval by the California Transportation Commission in the spring.

    The Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 would authorize a general obligation bond issue of $1.9 billion to provide funds principally for passenger and commuter rail systems. Planned for the June 1990 ballot, the measure is specific on various geographical allotments. Among them are $6 million for improvement of rail service, including rail freight and tourist related services, in Humboldt County. Four million dollars is allotted to Mendocino County for the same purposes.

    Examining the four piece of legislation in more detail, one learns that SB 1663 creates a North Coast Railroad Authority, which is to be governed by a board five directors. Two persons are to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors of Humboldt County and two by the Board of Supervisors of Mendocino County. The District Director of Caltrans District 1 will be the fifth member, serving ex officio.

    The law requires that the authority shall conduct its first meeting not later than 120 days after the abandonment or discontinuance of service on any of the three railroads included in the measure.

    In addition to issuing revenue bonds, the authority is empowered to acquire properties, operate railroads, and accept grants or loans from state or federal agencies or other

sources, both private and public. It may select a franchisee to acquire or operate a rail transportation system.

    The legislation also provides that the authority can be expanded to include Del Norte County if rail expansion becomes feasible, and to Marin and Sonoma Counties if regional planning for a line from Humboldt to Marin becomes appropriate.

    AB 1374, the short-line rehabilitation urgency measure, provides that, to be eligible for funding, a project proposal must be submitted by a public entity that has made a finding, following a public hearing, that rail service on the affected railroad is in imminent danger of being discontinued without the expenditure of public funds and that the continuation of service serves a public purpose.

    "Short-line railroad" is defined in the law as any standard gauge railroad, which is being, or is planned to be, used for passenger service, other than a Class 1 railroad as defined by federal law.

(Class 1 railroads are major interstate lines. Southern Pacific, Santa Fe and Union Pacific are examples.)

  The Intercity and the Commuter and Urban Rail Transit Programs are handled by Caltrans, acting under the direction of the California Transportation Commission. In the Intercity Rail Program, the legislation identifies five areas in which rail operations are eligible for funding. Designated as "corridors," they are: Los Angeles-San Diego; Santa Barbara County-Los Angeles ; Los Angeles-Fresno-San Francisco Bay Area and Sacramento; San Francisco Bay Area-Sacramento-Auburn; San Francisco-Santa Rosa-Eureka.

    It is worthy of note here that the California Western Railroad runs the only private intercity passenger service in the state of California. The others are Amtrak, federally funded, and Caltrains, the state-funded operation on the San Francisco peninsula.

    Intercity projects can be nominated by local public entities, by regional planning agencies, rail corridor agencies, Amtrak and by railroads themselves. There are no requirements for a local match.

    As mentioned above, the Clean Air and Transportation Act would include specific allotments to specific areas throughout the state. These are spelled out in considerable detail with the amount of the allotment stipulated in each case. They are much more extensive than the five corridors designated in the Intercity Rail Program. Grants would be handled by the California Transportation Commission and Caltrans.

 

 

 

February 1990

Developing Support for Rail

 in the 1990's

 

A REPORT ON THE MCRS SPONSORED "RAILROAD COALITION PROGRESS MEETING"

 

 RAILROAD ROLE MODELS from San Diego to Arcata were present at the third Railroad Coalition Progress Meeting sponsored by MCRS on January 17 at the Willits Civic Center. The first meeting of this kind was held in September 1988, in Northspur. Local officials and representatives from neighboring counties, from our legislators, Caltrans, CPUC and railroad societies were invited to discuss the regeneration of rail.

    A second meeting in December, 1988, resulted in the introduction of two  railroad bills, AB 1374 and SB 1663.

    The purpose of the third meeting was to assess what had occurred over the last year, to evaluate the situation, and to form a plan of action for 1990.

    After a short introduction by MCRS Chairman Jack Boone, Mayor Ed Scott welcomed everyone to Willits. He said the City

of Willits feels it is critical to keep the railroad viable both for freight and passenger service in Northern California. "We consider Willits as a hub or nucleus for continuing to fight the struggle for a better rail service."              

    Marin supervisor Bob Roumiguiere gave a short account of the history of the 101 Corridor Action Committee, which completed its job last year with recommending the use of rail for the corridor. Negotiations for acquisition of the NWP right-of-way have been going on for some time with Southern Pacific Company. The asking price is $43 million for the rail line from Marin County to Willits, including the connection from Ignacio to Lombard. The first part of the line, from Bellam Boulevard in San Rafael to Novato, will probably be purchased this year. The options are to buy the second part from Marin to Healdsburg within three years and the rest up to Willits within four or five years. Margie Handley, a local Willits resident and member of the California Transportation Commission, talked in detail about possibilities and complexities of making funds available for the local railroads and what could be in store if raising the Gann spending limit were approved by the voters in June

    Jim Knox, land-use director from the Planning and Conserva-

tion League, gave an excellent talk on the rail initiative and pointed out that these funds can be used for rail only. The moneys are allocated on a per capita basis to the individual counties. Mendocino and Humboldt counties will receive $10 million. Endorsement of the initiative by the supervisors of Mendocino and Humboldt counties and any civic groups in the area would be very welcome and would help to get it passed by the voters in June. The two major candidates for governor, Pete Wilson and John van de Camp, have both endorsed the initiative.

Knox also provided some background on his organization, a coalition of about 120 conservation groups around the state. PCL is a lobbying group for environmental legislation and was the sponsor of Proposition 70, the California Wildlife, Coastal and Parks Initiative, in 1988. They have been very much involved with transportation issues for about five years. Rail use is an environmental issue, he said.

    Theresa Staber, Assemblyman Dan Hauser's aide, explained in detail how the funds from the Short-line Rehabilitation Bill (AB 1374) could be expended, a rather complex issue since transit money is very mixed up with highway funds. The money could come from either the Transit, Planning and Development Fund or from the Transit Capital Improvement Fund.

Given the budget constraint, Governor Deukmejian's proposed budget this year wipes out the TCI fund. He also took out $40 million from the TPD fund, which has only $19.2 million left, whereas last year's transit budget was $108.million, both funds combined. Fifteen per cent of the TPD fund should go to some 20 counties that qualify for the money through ballot initiatives, which were made possible by Proposition 5 during the midseventies. In addition, the CTC has already made a commitment for $700 million to fund the Los Angeles Metro system and BART.

                 So where do the $750,000 come from that the Eureka Southern Railroad has applied for under AB 1374? There will be a public CTC hearing on February 15 in Sacramento on transit issues and a priority list for funds will be established and presented to the legislators. It would be very important to have representation from the Mendocino and Humboldt county supervisors, cities, railroads and lobby groups at the meeting to request high priority for funding of the ESR.

    Rick Provenca, Senator Barry Keene's aide, spoke about the Railroad Authority, SB 1663, and explained that it could be extended to Del Norte County as well as Sonoma and Marin counties. He pointed out how important a well functioning rail service (freight and tourist and commuter trains) could be for the north counties protecting the roads from congestion and increasing deterioration.

    The two Mendocino County commissioners for the newly created Railroad Authority were also present: Ruth Rockefeller, MCRS vice president, and Gary Milliman, Fort Bragg city administrator. They both believe that the commission should get to work as soon as possible and develop a plan before an emergency occurs. At this time, the Humboldt County members have not been named. The fifth member - ex officio —  is the Caltrans director, Gene Poch, in Eureka.

   The highlights of the meeting were two railroad success stories by Art Lloyd, from Amtrak and Dick Engle, vice president of the San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad.

   Amtrak has overwhelming response from the public—they almost always run full trains! The prognosis for the year 2000 is that Amtrak will be the only railroad in the world to break even or show a small profit. The San Diego-Los Angeles train— although it runs through an area where there are more automobiles than people—has the second highest occupancy rate in the nation. Amtrak will get 165 new superliners this year to accommodate the growing demand.

The total Amtrak budget per year to run 300 trains daily is about $600 million—the cost of one B-l Stealth  bomber or the overhaul of  Air force One 747.

    The SD & IVRR was sold by Southern Pacific to the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board, which started the now famous San Diego Trolley System. Kyle Railways (the owner of California Western Railroad) had a contract to operate freight movements on the line. But business declined and finally the railroad applied for abandonment, which was denied by the California Public Utilities Commission. 

    In 1984, Rail Tex Inc. took over the operation of the line and Dick Engle became the general manager. In the beginning they were excited when they had 80 freight cars a month; now they run 600.

      Many of the goods formerly shipped by trucks are going by rail now, which took a lot of trucks off the road. The trolley system has also become very successful and serves the area well—an overall victory for the "environmentally friendly" railroad.

Although they now have more business, more engines, more employees, they have not lost their individual thinking. The employees consider it their railroad and run it that way. Profit sharing now brings a substantial amount to all of them every three months. Someone from the audience asked Dick,      

"How have you succeeded to be so successful?" Dick answered, "With persistence—never give up, and convince shippers with an aggressive marketing team that shipping by railroad is the most economical land transportation available."

    MCRS envisions a partnership between freight and passenger service such as this for the railroad from Larkspur to Eureka.

    One of the shippers on the ESR, Paul Tureb from Blue Lake Forest Products in Arcata, emphasized how important the

railroad is for their business, both ecologically and socially. They ship a substantial amount of lumber by rail, and he remembers the frustrating struggle when they had to ship all by truck for two and a half years when the railroad was not running. They are very thankful to the ESR for hauling their lumber.

    Mendocino County supervisor Jim Eddie made a remark that was dear to all of us who love railroads: not to give up if part of the line is destroyed (pertaining to the Eel River floods) in tribute to those who built it. But he also warned, considering the reality, giving up a railroad would be an environmental disaster.

    There were good comments from rail advocates: Lionel Gambill, from the Sonoma County Redwood Railroad Council, stressed how little time we might have left if we do not take drastic steps to save the environment. In view of the environmental crisis, it is very important that trains start to operate as soon as possible. Technically, they could start running within two years.

    Toby Leibert, from the North Bay Transit Committee, talked about the situation in Marin County. Except for San Rafael, all Marin cities have endorsed rail for the corridor, and he feels San Rafael will soon follow suit. The November election will bring a measure before Marin voters on whether to implement a commuter rail service, and Tony is pretty sure that it will pass. NBTC is already in high gear campaigning for the issue. Both Toby Leibert and Lionel Gambill have been very active during all these years on the 101 Corridor Action Committee.

    Nick Tibbet, Congressman Bosco's aide, praised the positive spirit that guides Amtrak and the SD & IVRR and believes that this kind of spirit should get us through in our attempt to regenerate the Northcoast railroads. He has high hopes for the future of this project now, he would not have been so optimistic two years ago, he said. He suggested to go ahead with the Boy Scout's motto, "Be prepared."

    MCRS hopes that the encouraging pro-rail talks of this meeting will result again in good accomplishments for 1990—more trains and cleaner air.

 

April 1990

North Coast Railroad Authority:

All the commissioners for the North Coast Railroad Authority

(established recently by the passage of Assembly Bill 1374) have now been appointed. The first meeting will be announced soon. The Mendocino County commissioners are Ruth Rockefeller and Gary Milliman. The Humboldt County commissioners are Delbert Brown and Lloyd Hecathorn. The

fifth member—ex officio—is Gene Poch, the Caltrans district director in Eureka.

 

October 1990

NCRA Discusses Plans to Acquire Marin-to-Willits NWP Right-of-Way

       By Ruth Rockefeller

A long anticipated meeting between the North Coast Railroad Authority and Supervisor Bob Roumiguiere of Marin County was held in Ukiah September 17. Also participating were representatives of Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Mendocino and Humboldt counties, as well as the Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District.

 

On the agenda was a progress report on the acquisition of the Northwestern Pacific right-of-way. So far only the southernmost portion, as far north as Novato Creek, has been purchased by the NWP Acquisition Task Force, which in-

cludes the Golden Gate District, the County of Marin and the Marin Transit Authority.

   There are two options to purchase the remainder of the line all the way to Willits, with the Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District as the lead agency. The option to purchase the line to Healdsburg is three years in length and to Willits, four years. The options run concurrently, and the one to Willits includes the right-of-way as far as Lombard in Napa County.

                 Raising funds to pay for the acquisition was one of the topics of discussion. Many pro-acquisition activities, such as environmental assessments, title reports, and appraisals are going on at present and will have to be paid for. For a four-year period these costs are estimated at approximately $3 million.

                Also discussed were the possibilities of creating a new entity under a joint powers agreement to acquire and later operate the railroad. Stan Hulett, who serves as a commissioner on both the California Public Utilities Commission and the California Transportation Commission, said that it was logical to assume that the North Coast Railroad Authority could be expanded to oversee the acquisition and perhaps the operation, if the Golden Gate Bridge District does not wish to do so.

Rick Provenza, aide to Senator Barry Keene, agreed to bring the matter of expanding the North Coast Railroad Authority to the Senator’s attention. It was Senator Keene’s bill that created the authority under SB 1663. The legislation was sought for and promoted by the Mendocino County Railway Society.

A second meeting of participants in the September 17 meeting has been scheduled for December 10 in Santa Rosa.

 

 

 

December - 1990

Sierra Club Supports the Eureka Southern

 

  The Redwood Chapter of the Sierra Club (Humboldt, Mendocino, Lake, Solano, Sonoma and Napa counties) has endorsed a resolution in support of the Eureka Southern

Railroad. The Sierra Club is a strong advocate for rail

transportation nationwide.

Following is the text of the resolution:

 

RESOLUTION: The Redwood Chapter of the Sierra Club sup-

ports the viability of the Eureka Southern Railroad for freight and passenger service for the following reasons:

 

  —Liquidation of the ES becomes inevitable if no buyer can be found within four months after the creditors have accepted the reorganization papers filed by trustee Jerry Gregg with the Bankruptcy Court.

 

  —The tracks, bridges and piers would be removed for their salvage value. In addition, the cessation of maintenance of culverts, bridges and tunnels would hasten the destabilization of the fragile riverbanks. An environmental disaster of unimaginable proportions would ensue.

 

  —Highway 101 already is extremely congested in certain areas. Additional trucks that would carry the freight now shipped by rail would make it worse. These trucks would use at least three times more fossil fuels than the railroad and would consequently cause substantially more air pollution than the train.

    If the railroad would ship freight again at the 1970 level, a

considerable relief from truck traffic on Highway 101 could be experienced. Passenger service by rail from Marin to Humboldt County could also decrease automobile traffic and pollution.

 

    The Sierra Club Redwood Chapter will therefore strongly support the viability of the Eureka Southern Railroad because of its environmentally friendly influence on the quality of life for the north coast counties and will continue to work with the

North Coast Railroad Authority to take over the railroad, hire a qualified operator to run it, and thus save it from abandonment.

 

August - 1991

Amendment to Rail Bill Signed Into Law

Reprinted from The Willits News.

               

A bill by Assemblyman Dan Hauser allowing the North Coast Railroad Authority to act in the event of bankruptcy or sale of North Coast rail lines was signed by Governor Wilson last week. 

 Assembly Bill 344 (an amendment to 3B1663) will clarify that the NCRA is also authorized to act in the event of bankruptcy or sale of the rail service.

  The Eureka Southern is currently in receivership. Because the bankruptcy proceedings involving the railroad line will be ending in December of this year, Hauser had an urgency clause added to the bill to make certain the NCRA has the authority to act if it is necessary to acquire the railroad.

The North Coast Railroad Authority for Mendocino and Humboldt counties, created by Assemblyman Hauser and Senator Barry Keene legislation last year, was established to provide a means for ensuring railroad service on the North Coast.

 If the present rail lines are discontinued or abandoned, the authority would be authorized to acquire and operate the railroads or select a franchisee to operate a rail transportation system. Additionally, the authority may apply for available public funds for railroad purposes, issue revenue bonds and conduct planning and engineering studies for improving rail service.

Bulletin:

Rail Authority Considers Purchase of the Eureka Southern

  At a regularly scheduled meeting July 10 in Eureka, the North Coast Railroad Authority held a closed session during which negotiations toward the possible purchase of the Eureka

Southern Railroad Company, Incorporated, were discussed.

The Authority has called another meeting for July 24 to dis-

cuss the matter further.

That meeting will be held at the Willits City Hall at 1:30 p.m. That will also include a closed session. Further information may

be obtained from the Authority's legal counsel, the firm of

Davis, McClendon, Poovey, Anderson and Morrison, Inc, 937

6th Street, Eureka 95501, telephone: (707) 443-6744.

 

December - 1991

North Coast Rail Authority Granted Chance to Purchase

Eureka Southern Railroad

THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER 11, 1991 was a climactic one for  the Eureka Southern Railroad, the North Coast Railroad Authority, and somewhat more indirectly, the Mendocino County Railway Society.

     On Tuesday, November 12, a federal bankruptcy court  decision was made public, naming the North Coast Railroad Authority the successful bidder for the bankrupt Eureka Southern Railroad. Two days later, the California Transportation Commission unanimously granted the North Coast Railroad Authority $6.1 million in Proposition 116 funds to purchase the line and keep it operative.

  Both the decision of U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Alan Jaroslovsky and the favorable vote of the CTC are loaded with conditions, which must be met by the NCRA before the purchase becomes a reality.

    The five-member NCRA and its rail consultant, Calrail, with the assistance of many government entities and individuals, are hard at work to meet the deadlines imposed by the Court and the TC. The final and most crucial of these is April 1, 1992, by which date, according to the judge's decision, the sale must be consummated.

Throughout the always complex and often stormy history of the bankruptcy, the MCRS has also been hard at work, helping to ward off  liquidation of the railroad, which stretches from Willits to Eureka  through the Eel River canyon. Many of the MCRS efforts have been low key and behind the scenes, but very effective.

    The Society cooperated with State Senate Majority Leader Barry  Keene and State Assemblyman Dan  Hauser as the two North Coast legislators formulated two vital pieces of legislation—Keene's SB 1663, which created the NCRA, and Hauser's AB 1374, a short line rehabilitation measure.

    Public meetings sponsored by the MCRS, at Northspur and in  Willits, facilitated input into the legislative process. Society members also worked for passage of Proposition 116, the Clean Air and Transportation Act of 1990, from which the funds to purchase the Eureka Southern will come.

    Keene and Hauser were instrumental in the wording of Proposition 116, which makes monies available to Humboldt and Mendocino counties on an entirely different basis from the provisions for all other counties in the state. The key words are "including rail freight service and tourist-related services."

    The inclusion of "rail freight" is vital to the North Coast needs, since, at present, continuation of freight service is the key to the survival of the North Coast rail network, comprised of the Eureka Southern, the California Western and the Northwestern Pacific railroads.

    At this writing, freight rolls down the Eel River canyon at the rate of nearly 100 cars per week. This represents about 75 per cent of the tonnage that moves south from Willits on the Northwestern Pacific. Some freight, a relatively small amount, comes off the California Western at Willits.

    Because much of the freight leaving Willits on the NWP moves at night, and because the Eureka Southern trains slide unseen through the uninhabited canyon, there is a curious public misconception that almost no rail service exists on the ESRR or the NWP.

    The misconception has been translated into "one train a week." There are, in fact, two trains a day—or more accurately, a night— between Willits and Petaluma, one northbound and one southbound, six days a week.

    The "one-train-a-week" myth spread to the Eureka Southern and almost went into a public document before a hasty correction was made.

The facts are these: Currently 20 crews are called each week, which means that 20 trains are moving somewhere on the railroad every week. Of these, at present, six are long hauls, between Scotia and Willits, three southbound and three northbound.

     In short, in spite of public misconception, freight service will be the major factor in the survival of the North Coast rail network for some time to come. The NCRA, in formulating its operating plans, is taking that fact into consideration. The Authority hopes to improve relationships with shippers and to look for sources of new business.

     At the same time, it plans to revive the North Coast Daylight passenger service as soon as possible, perhaps, on a limited basis, as early as next summer. It might be of interest that the North Coast Daylight, prevented from operating between Willits and Eureka by Federal Railroad Authority decree since May of 1990, has, with the approval of the FRA, made a number of short runs this year. They include trips between Eureka and Arcata July 4, and two barbecue runs to Fort Seward from Eureka this fall. Special holiday trips between Eureka and Arcata have been scheduled for the Christmas season.

    Meanwhile, the only unsubsidized inter-city passenger service in California continues to run 362 days a year from Fort Bragg to Willits and return. This is, of course, the California Western's Skunk train.

    To put it briefly, the North Coast rail network has, along with its distinguished past, a working present and a viable future. The NCRA, with the help of many agencies and individuals, is  dedicated to the premise that the  future will be bright and enduring.

 

May/June - 1992 

 

Congratulations to the NCRA and the North Coast Railroad!

       As we mentioned in the last newsletter's bulletin, all the hurdles for the purchase of the Eureka Southern Railroad were finally overcome. On April 1 the deal was closed and the North Coast Railroad Authority became the new owner of the "North Coast Railroad."

         The NCRA has already made the first major decision to purchase four new/used engines from Southern Pacific and lease two additional ones with the option to buy. Aggressive marketing for new freight accounts is of utmost importance, and already weekly loads are up compared to previous months.

        When the earthquake hit Northern California April 25 and 26, we were all very concerned about "our railroad." But just as Caltrain and Bart were running again only hours after the Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989, the North Coast Railroad escaped serious damage. An inspection trip showed the tunnels to be safe and some slides without damage to the tracks. Of course we all are waiting for passenger excursions through the Eel River canyon to be taken up again. Please be patient; it all will happen in due time. We will keep you updated.

 

July/August - 1992

 

SAN FRANCISCO - EUREKA CORRIDOR

The public Caltrans hearing held June 18 in Santa Rosa on intercity rail passenger service between the Bay Area and  Eureka was  very  encouraging. All of those given testimony

advocating beginning rail passenger service. It was pointed out that part of the  corridor includes  Napa  junction. Passenger  service that  Includes  this  junction  would enable

connections to Amtrak and points :North, South and East.

To qualify for State funding passenger service must obtain at least 55% of its revenue from  farebox  revenue by the third year of existence. The Willits to Eureka segment has a history of profitable service. Ruth Rockefeller, Co-Chair of  the  North  Coast  Railroad Authority, said, "We  expect to start passenger service very soon. Excursions may start by the end of the year," Rail passenger service between Larkspur and Willits may be less cost effective according to the Wilbur Smith Study. "Diesel powered light-rail passenger cars are  much  more  economical"  declared  Mr. Setty  of  the  Modern Transit Society, "these vehicles are mass produced by Duewag to run  on  standard  track."  "This is  a  splendid feasibility  study,"  beamed  Paul  Copeland, Chairman of the MCRS. "It's time to go on to phase II. Traffic along the 101 corridor is too congested and needs to be relieved as soon as possible.

 

February/March - 1993

The two local rail measures in Mendocino and Humboldt—making them Article XIX counties—were passed by the voters. Both counties are now eligible to receive funding for rail transit from a general fund, there are no new taxes involved. The monies are disbursed in relation to population figures and can only be used for capital expenditures.

                 Unfortunately, the rail bond proposition, 156, failed. This was a big blow to all rail supporters. Interestingly, the voters of Marin County voted for 156 with the highest percentage— 59.6%—in the whole state. This should give a clear message to those people in Marin who have been boycotting passenger rail for the past five years.

Acquisition of Northwestern Pacific Right of Way Negotiations for the purchase of the Northwestern Pacific right- of-way from Lombard in Napa county to Willits are continuing. The Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District holds the option, which may be exercised by October of this year. In the meantime, a search for an operator is being conducted, and efforts are being made to pull an operating agency together that  would include Marin and Sonoma  counties. (Call your county supervisors and urge them to support rail. They need to hear from you. Remember: 59.6% of the Marin voters and 50.5%

of the Sonoma voters voted for the rail bond. The majority wants rail!)

                Wilbur Smith and Associates is beginning Phase Two of an inter-city rail passenger program for the San Francisco Bay-Eureka corridor. This is a study commissioned by Caltrans

and managed by Caltrans District 1 under the direction of Linda Boyd.

                Phase One of the study concluded that three-day-a-week passenger service from Willits to Eureka is feasible, with an emphasis on tourist travel. The study showed a less than 55%

fare box return for the right of way south of Willits; however, a separate study, also done by Wilbur Smith for Marin County concluded that commuter service on the south end is feasible. Phase Two is expected to clarify the possibility for passenger service all along the corridor.

 

May/June - 1993

North Coast Railroad is Running Full Speed Ahead

 

  With a record shipment of 564 carloads in April, the North Coast Railroad goes into its second year of operation showing a 23 per cent increase in car loadings for its first year.

     The line, which runs from the Eureka area in Humboldt County to its point of interchange with the Northwestern Pacific branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad at Willits, operated as the Eureka Southern Railroad from 1984 through March of 1992.

    Purchased out of bankruptcy by the North Coast Railroad Authority and renamed the North Coast Railroad, the line posted overall car loadings of 4,466 in 1992, compared to 3,406 for the same period of time in 1991.

    The record was established despite the major earthquake in Humboldt County less than a month after the NCRA assumed ownership and massive storm damage in January of this year.

    Much needed rehabilitation of the railroad was given a boost by the California Transportation Commission on May 6, when the commissioners voted unanimously to approve an $800,000 grant of Transit Capital Improvement funds to upgrade the line.

        The grant will be matched by a like amount of "in kind labor" on the part of the NCRA, thus totaling $1.6 million for rehabilitation.

    The railroad will use funds to begin an extensive track improvement program this summer between Island Mountain and Willits. Approximately 30,000 new ties will be installed with related improvements in track surfacing, ballasting and alignment. Lines side ditching will also be a part of the program.

    The TCI grant is the second phase of the program begun while the line was in bankruptcy. Needed improvements north of Island Mountain were completed under Phase I by the NCRA.

     Phase II of the program is expected to start early in June.

     In the fall of 1992, the NCRA also completed work on Tunnel 40, near Loleta in Humboldt County. This was the second oldest tunnel on the Northwestern Pacific Railroad, dating from 1884, and the second longest on the present NCRR at nearly 2,000 feet. (The 4,300-foot Island Mountain tunnel is the longest.)

     Phase n repairs and additional work planned under Proposition 116 funding will improve the trackage to the point at which passenger excursion service can be resumed from Willits to Eureka.

     At present, the passenger service is operative with selected short runs in the Eureka and Willits areas.

     Negotiations are underway between the North Coast Railroad Authority and Sonoma County to put into effect the agreement for the county to join NCRA. The decision to join the Authority was passed unanimously by resolution of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors April 6. Details are being worked out by attorneys for the two entities.

     Entrance of Sonoma County into the NCRA will strengthen the Authority, which has represented Humboldt and Mendocino counties since its inception in January, 1990. It should speed acquisition of the Northwestern Pacific trackage, which will improve freight service all along the North Coast of California and open the way for some kind of passenger service south of Willits.

 

August/September - 1993

Sonoma County Joins NCRA

 

   The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors and the North Coast Railroad Authority recently signed a resolution that will finally make it possible for Sonoma County to join the NCRA. Although a preliminary resolution concerning the same matter had been voted on earlier in April, several technicalities had to be discussed and dealt with. Now the road is clear and the two representatives from Sonoma County to the NCRA, should be appointed very soon. In addition to the District 1 Caltrans Director Gene Wahl as an ex officio member of the NCRA there will be another ex officio member, a representative from the Golden Gate Bridge District Board. A seventh voting member to the NCRA will be a representative of one of the cities alone the line.

     MCRS hopes that the new, expanded NCRA will soon finalize the acquisition of the NWP from Willits to the south and begin to make plans for the long-awaited passenger service.

 

 February/March - 1994

Rail Authority makes bid to run line

By Ruth Rockefeller                

    Two meetings, some 220 miles apart on Tuesday. February 1, attested to the growing strength of the North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA) and the railroad network it is rebuilding after years of neglect.

     One meeting in Santa Rosa, a weekly session of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, reaffirmed the Supervisors'

commitment to the NCRA as the potential owner of the entire line, which stretches from Korbel in Humboldt County to the interchange with Southern Pacific (SP) in Solano County.

     The other, a smaller but no less important meeting in Eureka, gave major shippers in that area an update on track conditions and an outline of the NCRA five-year business plan, prepared by John Williams of the Woodside Consulting Group, the executive director of the NCRA. That plan includes $12 million worth of track rehabilitation.

     Also explaining the NCRA program to the shippers were Dennis Wood, Authority chairman, and Dave Hebert, the general manager of the North Coast Railroad (NCRR).

     As the result of that session, several major shippers pledged their support of the NCRA's acquisition of the southern half of the former Northwestern Pacific Railroad (NWPRR) from a point just north of Willits to the interchange with SP, a distance of approximately 160 miles.

      Two thirds of the freight which now moves between the former NWP and the SP mainline originates in Humboldt County.

At issue, and moving toward a resolution at a summit meeting scheduled for February 25, are the stated position of Marin County and the Golden Gate Bridge District and also the quality of service provided between the Willits and the SP interchange by the California Northern Railroad (CFNR), a lessee operator selected by SP, Marin County and the Golden Gate Bridge District in September 1993 to move freight on the south end.

    The summit meeting, called by federal and state legislators, is an effort to iron out some of the differences between the Bridge District and Marin County, on the one hand, and Humboldt, Mendocino and Sonoma counties on the other.

     The position of the Marin County faction is that the railroad right-of-way, principally between Larkspur and Healdsburg, should be acquired and owned by an "agency" of indeterminate structure for promotion of rail passenger services—or possibly for High Occupancy Vehicle highway lanes.

This stance is held despite the fact that sales tax increases for passenger rail transit have been defeated in both Marin and Sonoma counties.

     Moreover, a recently released working paper on an Intercity Passenger Rail feasibility study, commissioned by Caltrans, concludes that passenger service on the south end of the former NWP would be costly and would not recover the necessary 55 percent the fare box return for intercity rail funding.

 It is the belief of NCRA directors and staff that ownership of the 300-mile line and freight operation on it by the NCRA is the only viable answer to freight movements in northwestern California, an area larger than several eastern states.

     The NCRA envisions a future with intermodal freight operations, combining rail, highway and sea transportation. This is an extremely important aspect of the future of port development at Humboldt Bay.

     Already a leader in rail passenger excursion service on the North Coast, the NCRA is also confident that it can develop eminent satisfactory passenger operations south of Willits, beginning with excursion trips and expanding to intercity and commuter to meet future demands.

 

May/June - 1994

NCRA's Acquisition of Willits-to-Larkspur Rail Line Moves Closer to Realization.

 

by Ruth Rockefeller

 

REUNIFICATION OF THE  FORMER NORTHWESTERN

PACIFIC RAILROAD, a long-held dream of the Mendocino County Railway Society, moved a step closer to reality during the week of May 16, with positive action by two governmental bodies.

                Perhaps "dream" isn't the word here, for MCRS has been in the forefront of the fight to bring the former NWP back under one ownership, preferably that of the North Coast Railroad Authority, which the Society was instrumental in establishing.

                Although there are undoubtedly roadblocks ahead, placed in large part by certain elements in Marin County, acquisition of the line south of Willits, and, finally, ownership by the NCRA now seems possible.

                   On Wednesday, May 18, the NCRA approved two documents at its monthly meeting in Fortuna. One was a memorandum, which would restructure the NCRA to afford protection to the NWP assets, separating them from the assets of the NCRA.

                "Protection" of assets south of Willits had been a major bone of contention put forth by the Marin County group led by Supervisor Bob Roumiguiere.

                 Other Marin County concerns were addressed in a resolution establishing policy   "with respect to activating expansion of the Authority jurisdiction to Marin County."

                Both documents had been approved in concept by the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors the previous day, subject to final approval by the NCRA.

                Jim Harberson, chair of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors and also president of the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District, announced that he would direct Bridge staff to work with the NCRA on the acquisition.

                The Bridge Board holds the option to buy the so-called south end of the former NWP from its current owner, Southern Pacific Transportation Company. SP has leased freight operation on the line to the California Northern Railroad. Because of SP policy, no passenger service can be operated on the trackage at present 

The NCRA, which owns the line north of Willits, operates both freight and limited excursion passenger service as the North Coast Railroad.

                 Restructuring of the NCRA, as approved in the memorandum, calls for the North Coast Railroad to be created as a separate railroad operating entity; the NWP, the entity for the consummation of the acquisition south of Willits, as another separate body; and the NCRA as a holding company with

 the responsibility for establishing and providing policy, strategic direction, management, financial control and common marketing of all three entities.

                 A further provision of the memorandum stipulates that the NCRA would enter a contract with Sonoma and Marin counties and the Bridge District for a 20-year term. That contract would require that none of NWP's assets would be utilized either to fund the operations of the NCRR or to be pledged as collateral for loans to the NCRR without the express consent of all parties to the contract. The contract could be terminated or modified only with the consent of all parties.

The resolution spells out further stipulations designed to ally the concerns of the Marin County contingent

 

December - 1994

NCRA's compromise moves right-of-way acquisition closer to reality.

 

           Representatives from Marin and Sonoma counties, the North Coast Railroad Authority and the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transit District met on November 4 in Santa Rosa. They jointly developed a proposal concerning the pending acquisition of the NWP right-of-way. At the NCRA meeting on November 16 in Fortuna, the commissioners voted to accept the following proposal as a possible compromise:

                1. Ownership of the remaining NWP right-of-way to be acquired would be vested with the NCRA

               2. The County of Marin and the Golden Gate Bridge. Highway and Transit District would retain ownership of that portion of me right-of-way already owned by those agencies in Marin County.

               3. NCRA will convey to the Joint Powers Agency formed by the Sonoma County Transit Authority, Marin County and the GGBHTD an easement for passenger service  (commute, intercity and excursion) from Cloverdale south to Novato. NCRA would retain the authority to offer intercity and excursion service south of Cloverdale until the JPA offers such service, and thereafter through a coordination of service agreement.

                4. Marin and GGBHTD will convey a freight service easement to NCRA between Ignacio and Novato.

                5. NCRA and the new Joint Powers Agency would develop and execute a coordination of service agreement.

                6. NCRA/new JPA easement agreement would include reversion provisions whereby ownership of right-of-way would revert to JPA in the event NCRA became insolvent.

               By accepting the compromise proposal, the NCRA has made a very serious effort to facilitate the acquisition. The main obstruction to the deal still comes from south of the Sonoma County line, and we hope that with this latest compromise by the NCRA, Marin will do its part too and finally support the acquisition. Although Southern  Pacific is not yet willing to sell to the NCRA (as again expressed in a letter of November 9 by SP to Sonoma County Supervisor and GGBHTD president James Harberson), one can only hope that the issue will finally be resolved to the satisfaction of all parties and the deal can go through before the end of the year. WE URGE ALL MCRS MEMBERS AND FRIENDS OF THE RAILROAD TO MAKE AN ALL-OUT EFFORT TO CONTACT THEIR LOCAL REPRESENTATIVES, write letter to the newspapers, call the talk shows and voice strong support for the acquisition of the NWP right-of-way by the NCRA! You can make a difference!

                In other matters, Gary Milliman, Fort Bragg city administrator and commissioner on the NCRA for Mendocino County, was elected as incoming chairman for 1995.  The next NCRA meeting will be in Sonoma County on December 21.

 

May/June - 1995

The North Coast Railroad needs your help—NOW!

BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY  LEADERS from Humboldt  County met on April 26 in Eureka to discuss economic development ideas for the area. Dave Hebert, general manager of the North Coast Railroad, emphasized the point that the NCR "is a very integral part of the economic system on the north coast." Although the railroad had been practically shut down since January 10 because of the storm-inflicted track damage, it is now back to about75% of its operation. At the North Coast Railroad Authority meeting on April 27, Hebert said that he could foresee increasing freight shipping on the line to as many as 715 cars a month by year's end. Without the freight coming from the north coast, the rest of the rail line south of Willits cannot survive.

There is no question that the railroad suffered great losses, not only from the damage to the line itself, but also the loss in revenues. The financial report at the April 27 meeting did not look good. NCRA executive director John Williams told the board that by late summer the railroad will have a $2.2 million deficit. Although the NCR is eligible for FEMA money, it will be slow in coming. Unfortunately, the NCR is restricted in obtaining a loan because it is the only agency in the state that cannot use its property as collateral.

The NCR's problems were on the agenda of the California Transportation Commission on May 2. The CTC ordered a review of the NCRA to decide whether it will be possible for the railroad to survive. Caltrans seems to favor shutting down the railroad, preferring to use the funds for roads.

This is where we need your help! Please join us in writing letters to or calling the state representatives of the North Coast.

      Tell them it would be a terrible mistake to give up this railroad. Without the freight coming from the north cost, the rest of the line south of Willits cannot survive.

     The NCR has at times run as many as 400 freight cars per day (see Fred  Stindt’s NWPR  books.)

How can Caltrans be so shortsighted and not recognize the railroad's potential? This is a political ploy to torpedo the regeneration of rail for the entire San Francisco-Eureka rail corridor.

     At the March NCRA meeting, Mr. Hebert explained that all the areas where track rehabilitation had been completed last year, t